Chapter 10 radiological jobs typically encompass a wide range of professions that involve the use of various imaging modalities and radiation-based technologies for diagnostic, therapeutic, or research purposes. Here are some key areas of employment within radiology and radiological sciences:
Radiologic Technologists: These professionals operate imaging equipment, such as X-ray machines, CT scanners, MRI scanners, and mammography machines, to produce images of the human body for diagnostic purposes. They work in hospitals, clinics, and imaging centers.
Radiation Therapists: Radiation therapists administer radiation treatments to cancer patients as prescribed by radiation oncologists. They ensure that patients receive the correct dose of radiation in a safe and precise manner.
Nuclear Medicine Technologists: Nuclear medicine technologists prepare and administer radioactive drugs (radiopharmaceuticals) to patients and use specialized cameras to capture images of the distribution of these drugs in the body. This is used for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes.
Radiation Oncologists: Radiation oncologists are medical doctors who specialize in using radiation therapy to treat cancer. They develop treatment plans, oversee radiation therapy, and monitor patients' progress.
Radiologists: Radiologists are physicians who interpret medical images, such as X-rays, CT scans, MRIs, and ultrasounds, to diagnose diseases and conditions. They work closely with other healthcare providers to guide patient care.
Medical Physicists: Medical physicists ensure the safe and accurate use of radiation in medicine. They are responsible for quality control, equipment calibration, and treatment planning in radiation therapy, among other roles.
Health Physicists: Health physicists focus on radiation safety and protection. They work in healthcare settings, research institutions, and regulatory agencies to ensure that radiation exposure is within safe limits.
Radiation Safety Officers: Radiation safety officers oversee radiation safety programs in various organizations and ensure compliance with radiation safety regulations.
Radiologic Researchers: Researchers in radiology and radiological sciences conduct studies to advance the field, develop new imaging techniques, and improve treatment modalities.
Radiologic Equipment Sales and Support: Professionals in this category provide sales, maintenance, and technical support for radiological equipment and technology used in healthcare and industry.
Radiologic Education and Training: Educators and trainers in radiology and radiological sciences teach and mentor future radiologic technologists, therapists, and medical professionals.
Radiologic Administration and Management: Administrators and managers oversee radiology departments, imaging centers, and radiation therapy facilities, ensuring efficient operations and quality patient care.
The specific job coverage within radiology can vary depending on factors like specialization, education, and experience. Radiology is a diverse and rapidly evolving field with opportunities in clinical practice, research, education, and industry. Careers in radiology are essential to modern healthcare, as they contribute to disease diagnosis, treatment planning, and patient care.
This procedure describes the processes and instructions
for monitoring radiological work based on the radiological risk and the types
of radiological hazards that may be present.
Protective measures are described for each type of radiological hazard
to guide job coverage technicians in minimizing personnel dose and the
potential spread of contamination.
The processes described in this procedure are based on
common approaches used in the US nuclear power industry to provide job coverage
by radiation protection personnel. The
radiological concerns addressed by this procedure are based on the common
radiological hazards for the PWRs and BWRs operating in the US.
Common industry requirements and good practices are
described to enable supplemental technicians to understand the bases for
site-specific requirements. This
procedure is not intended to replace job-specific instructions that may be in
site procedures, job coverage guidelines, RWPs, ALARA Plans, etc.
This procedure includes generic instructions for
remote monitoring but does not include instructions for operating the specific
equipment that may be used for telemetry, cameras, and communications. The operation of remote monitoring equipment
is governed by site procedures and site-specific training.
The forms referenced by this procedure are examples
used to describe the pertinent information that should be recorded for future
reference. Plant procedures may specify
the use of equivalent forms or the use of electronic media for the same
purposes.
Member utilities are expected to use this standard to
enable supplemental workers to transition between nuclear power plants with
minimal site-specific training.
Compliance with these instructions is expected without additional site
requirements or process deviations being imposed that may require additional
training or challenge the performance of supplemental workers.
This procedure will be used to train and instruct
supplemental radiological protection technicians. Member utilities will implement these process
requirements in site procedures and update site procedures whenever
requirements or process steps in this Nuclear Industry Standard Process (NISP)
are revised. Current revisions are
maintained on the INPO website.
Terms, acronyms, and definitions not described in this
procedure are provided in NISP-RP-13, Radiological
Protection Glossary.
Clarifying notes for requirements and process steps
are provided in Section 4.0 using superscript numbers.
2.1
Review and understand expectations in site
procedure(s) for implementing the RWP program, including documents and records
required from job coverage technicians.
2.2
Ensure work is in compliance with radiological
protection requirements as specified in RWPs, ALARA Plans, and approved
procedures.
The following diagram shows the key elements in
providing job coverage. Detailed
instructions follow the diagram. Arrows
are provided to show the relationships among key elements and do not specify
requirements for sequencing activities.
1.1.1 Obtain
a turnover and/or a pre job brief to review the following information that may
be applicable:1
a. Most
recent radiological surveys.
b. RWPs,
allowed scope of work, and upcoming high risk activities.
c. ALARA
Plans.
d. RP
logs.
e. Condition
Reports.
1.1.2 Review
job coverage requirements on the applicable RWP and ALARA Plan and implement coverage
requirements consistent with Attachment 1, Job
Coverage Responsibilities. Notify RP
supervision if a discrepancy is apparent.
1.1.3 Obtain
“face-to-face” turnover when relieving for continuous job coverage.
1.1.4 Communicate
with workers to ensure they understand radiological conditions, protective
requirements, and work restrictions.2
a. Verify
understanding and compliance with additional dosimetry requirements such as
multi-badging, extremity monitoring, or neutron monitoring.
b. Ensure
workers understand the need to maintain the body positions assumed during
prejob planning and to notify RP if changes in work will invalidate those
assumptions. Refer to Attachment 8, Protective Measures for Gradients in
Radiation Fields.
1.1.5 Ensure
the correct equipment is available and operational as needed to perform surveys
and collect air samples.
1.1.6 Ensure
prejob briefings for workers have been completed per site procedures.
1.2.1 Perform
work area radiation and contamination surveys as needed to ensure the
radiological conditions during work activities are consistent with worker
briefings and within the ranges specified by the RWP and, if applicable, the
ALARA Plan.
a. Survey
immediately prior to beginning work if radiological conditions are unknown or potentially
unstable.
b. Survey
on a frequency as needed to validate conditions are stable; comply with survey
frequencies in procedures, RWP, and ALARA Plans when a survey frequency is
specified.
c. Survey
immediately if changes in conditions are suspected due to anomalies from worker
activities or plant conditions, e.g. system breaches, leaks, unexpected alarms,
etc.
1.2.2 Obtain
air samples per NISP-RP-03, Radiological
Air Sampling.
1.2.3 Pre-post
areas prior to performing work that is expected to increase radiation,
contamination, and airborne concentrations in accordance with NISP-RP-04, Radiological Posting and Labeling.
1.2.4 Communicate
survey results to workers with emphasis on the following elements.
a. Areas
where stay time should be minimized.
b. Areas
where dose rates are the lowest.
c. Desired
body positioning to minimize TEDE while working in areas with high contact
radiation levels or elevated radiation levels.
d. Steps
or conditions when workers need to stop to allow additional surveys or
protective actions before proceeding.
e. Where
contamination levels are high enough to challenge the effectiveness of workers’
protective clothing and the precautions that need to be taken.
f.
Preventative actions and work practices to
minimize the spread of contamination and prevent airborne radioactivity.
1.3
Monitor and Verify Protective Measures
1.3.1 Monitor
dose rates and work activities to assess the potential for unplanned dosimeter
alarms to occur. Inform RP supervision
about observed conditions that may result in any one of the following:
a. Work
area dose rates may exceed 80% of dose rate setpoints and personnel have not
been briefed that dose rate alarms may occur.
b. Cumulative
dose to an individual may exceed 80% of the dose setpoint.
c. Calculated
stay times are not sufficient for the work scope and may be challenged.
1.3.2 Monitor
worker compliance with RWP requirements and coach workers to correct behaviors
as needed.
a. Exercise
Stop Work Authority and notify RP supervision if behaviors are not corrected.
1.3.3 Fulfill
job coverage responsibilities as described in Attachment 1, Job Coverage Responsibilities.
1.3.4 Verify
individual doses are monitored per the RWP and, if applicable, the ALARA Plan.
1.3.5 Instruct
a worker to leave the area if the cumulative dose exceeds 80% of the dosimeter
dose setpoint or a worker is approaching the maximum calculated stay time.
a. Allow
workers to place systems and equipment in a safe condition prior to leaving the
area.
1.3.6 Monitor
worker practices in relation to gradients in dose rates to determine if
dosimetry requirements need to be reassessed.
Notify RP supervision if any assumptions used in the RWP evaluation for
dosimetry placement appear to be invalid or suspect. Protective measures are discussed in
Attachment 8, Protective Measures for
Gradients in Radiation Fields.
1.3.7 Determine
if work activities present a potential for a worker intake of radioactivity
that has not been evaluated by the RWP or applicable ALARA Plan. Notify RP supervision if protective actions
need to be reassessed.3 Protective measures are discussed in
Attachment 7, Protective Measures for
Airborne Radioactivity.
1.3.8 Monitor
worker practices and contamination levels to determine if protective actions
are sufficient to prevent worker intakes, personnel contamination and the
spread of contamination. Notify RP
supervision if protective actions may need to be reassessed. Protective
measures are discussed in the following attachments:
a. Attachment
3, Protective Measures for Work in
Contaminated Areas
b. Attachment
4, Protective Measures for Work in High
Contamination Areas
c. Attachment
5, Protective Measures for Discrete
Radioactive Particles
1.3.9 Determine
the potential for the work to generate highly radioactive items, e.g. bags of
trash or removed system components, and ensure protective measures are in place
to maintain worker dose ALARA such as:
a. Instruct
workers not to pick up or handle items in drained pools, e.g. sumps, tanks,
cavity, etc., until RP surveys have been performed and appropriate handling
methods have been established.
b. Place
highly radioactive items in a shielded or distant location so the items do not
contribute to work area dose rates.
c. Survey
trash and materials as they are collected and dispose or store the materials to
prevent increases in work area dose rates.
d. Ensure
area postings and labeling are in compliance with NISP-RP-04.
1.3.10 Determine
if the work will likely generate discrete radioactive particles and monitor the
work area for early detection and mitigation.
Ensure survey methods and protective measures detect and contain the
particles and prevent unplanned skin dose.
Protective measures are discussed in Attachment 5, Protective Measures for Discrete Radioactive Particles.
1.3.11 Determine
if exposed surfaces are contaminated with transuranic nuclides at levels that
require additional alpha monitoring during contamination surveys and air sample
analyses. Protective measures are
discussed in Attachment 6, Protective
Measures for Transuranic Nuclides.
1.4.1 Establish
and track the stay time of workers if any one of the following conditions
exists.
a. Work
area dose rates exceed 1,500 mrem per hour (deep dose equivalent).
b. A
worker’s dose for a single entry into the work area is expected to exceed 500
mrem.
c. As
otherwise required by the RWP or ALARA Plan.
1.4.2 Use
Attachment 2, Stay Time Log (or
equivalent) to track stay times.
a. Manually
track stay times when required even if telemetry is in use.
b. Ensure
direct communications with (or to) workers are in place to enable timely
intervention when stay times are approached or exceeded.
1.4.3 The
technician tracking stay time shall provide continuous attention to stay time
tracking and have no other duties with the following exception:
a. A
technician may use Attachment 2 to track stay time while performing remote
monitoring/telemetry to control individual doses.
1.4.4 Instruct
workers to exit the area before the dose limit is exceeded, allowing sufficient
time to place the work area in a safe condition.
1.4.5 Instruct
workers to relocate to a low dose rate area before exceeding stay times if an
evaluation is needed for a stay time extension.
a. Allow
sufficient time to place the work area in a safe condition.
1.4.6 Ensure
any extension of a stay time is documented and approved by RP supervision in
compliance with the following:
a. Personnel
are moved to a low dose area while the stay time extension is evaluated.
b. The
initial stay time has not been exceeded.
c. Accumulated
dose is less than 80% of the SRD dose setpoint.
d. Radiological
conditions are stable.
e. RP
supervision has reviewed work scope, effective dose rates, and the remaining
margin to the SRD dose setpoint.
f.
The revised stay time will not result in
exceeding the SRD dose setpoint and still enable placing equipment in a safe
condition prior to exiting the area.
g. Workers
have been briefed on the revised stay time requirement.
h. Approval
for the extension is documented on Attachment 2.
1.5
Respond to Unexpected Conditions
1.5.1 Notify
RP supervision whenever unexpected conditions challenge implementation of
requirements established for the radiological protection of personnel.
1.5.2 Maintain
awareness of work area radiation levels and how they could be affected by
system operations or maintenance activities.
Survey areas whenever dose rates may be potentially affected to provide
timely evaluation and intervention if needed.
1.5.3 Exercise
Stop Work Authority as described below.
1.6
Exercise Stop Work Authority
1.6.1 Instruct
an individual worker to exit the work area if the worker’s behaviors or
practices result in any one of the following:
a. An
unplanned, unanticipated dose rate alarm.
b. An
SRD dose alarm.
c. A
worker refuses to comply with or disregards radiation protection standards and
procedures or personnel instructions, either written or verbal.
d. An
increased potential for an intake due to work practices.
1.6.2 Instruct
all workers to exit the work area when the following job conditions exist:
a. Dose
rates have increased as follows:
1) Postings
must be changed to a High Radiation Area from a Radiation Area.
2) Postings
must be changed to a Locked High Radiation Area from a Radiation Area or High
Radiation Area.
3) Dose
rates are > 50% above the dose rates for which the workers were briefed and
the dose rates are > 100 mrem/hour.
b. Unexpected
airborne radioactivity occurs that requires a posting change per NISP-RP-04, Radiological Posting and Labeling.
c. Unexpected
airborne concentrations occur outside the bounds of the TEDE ALARA evaluation.
d. Multiple
workers exiting a work area alarm a gamma sensitive portal monitor.
e. Dosimetry
is not in place to measure extremity dose when required per Attachment 8, Protective Measures for Gradients in
Radiation Fields.
f.
The whole body compartment that will receive the
highest dose is not being monitored when required per Attachment 8, Protective Measures for Gradients in
Radiation Fields due to conditions such as:
1) Changes
in job scope or work methods have altered worker orientation to radiation
sources.
2) Radiation
sources have been added or removed from the work area.
3) Telemetry
failure.
g. Telemetry
failures have limited the ability to monitor dose as prescribed by site
procedures.
h. Two
or more workers experience dose alarms.
i.
Multiple unplanned personnel contaminations
occur on a single job during a shift (e.g. more than three).
j.
An EPRI Level 3 personnel contamination event
has occurred (non-discrete particle in a clean area) and the cause is unknown.
k. Contamination
levels have spread affecting other work groups or activities, e.g. more than 100
square feet in a clean area.
l.
Contamination levels have increased such that
established controls may not be adequate and are outside the bounds of the TEDE
ALARA evaluation.
m. Radiological
engineering controls have degraded such that the radiological conditions described
above could occur.
n. Any
other conditions that may jeopardize the safety of the worker.
1.6.3 When
stopping work, instruct workers to place systems and equipment in a safe
condition prior to leaving the work area and then report to the nearest RP
control point.
1.6.4 Immediately
notify RP supervision whenever work has been stopped, a worker has been
instructed to leave a work area, or if a worker has been prevented from
entering a work area.
a. Provide
support as requested by RP supervision for documentation, evaluation, and use
of the plant corrective action program.
b. RP
supervision is responsible for implementing site administrative procedures for
stopping work.
3.1
NISP-RP-03, Radiological Air Sampling
3.2
NISP-RP-04, Radiological Posting and Labeling
3.3
NISP-RP-05, Access Controls for High Radiation Areas
3.4
NISP-RP-07, Radioactive Material Control
3.5
NISP-RP-08, Use and Control of HEPA Filtration and Vacuum Equipment
3.6
NISP-RP-13, Radiological Protection Glossary
3.7
INPO 05-008, Radiological Protection at Nuclear
Power Stations, Rev 3, February 2017
3.8
INPO IER 15-23, Ineffective Dose Monitoring
Resulted in Workers Exceeding Administrative Limits, June 2015
3.9
Attachment 1: Job Coverage Responsibilities
A job coverage technician
is responsible for performing surveys to assess radiological hazards and
providing the necessary direction and support to implement protective measures
as described in this procedure, the applicable RWP, and ALARA Plan, if
required. The lead job coverage
technician provides overall direction to supporting technicians,
decontamination personnel, and working crews to ensure protective measures are
effectively implemented.
Continuous job coverage
is required when the radiological conditions and work activities present a
significant potential for adverse consequences if protective measures are not
effectively implemented. Such activities
require constant monitoring to:
·
Ensure protective measures are implemented as
planned and
·
Identify potential anomalies that may challenge
the effectiveness of planned protective measures.
Continuous coverage does not necessarily
mean continuous physical presence of the radiological protection technician at
the work site; rather, it means one or more technicians are given sole
responsibility to cover a job. If using
remote monitoring for continuous coverage, remote camera surveillance,
effective audio communication with the work area, and telemetry are required to
provide continuous coverage and minimize the dose to job coverage technicians.
Activities identified as having high
radiological risk are assigned continuous job coverage. Activities identified as having medium
radiological risk may be assigned continuous job coverage. INPO 05-008 defines radiological risk and
provides examples of work activities considered to have high and medium
radiological risk. Radiation work
permits specify when continuous or intermittent job coverage is required.
Activities identified as having low or
medium radiological risk may be assigned intermittent coverage. Intermittent coverage means a job coverage
technician may be assigned several jobs to monitor and periodically monitors
each activity in progress to provide support as needed.
Responsibilities
The lead job coverage technician and
supporting technicians are responsible for the following.
1.0 Ensure
technicians assigned to track stay times continuously provide full attention to
stay time tracking without ancillary duties other than tracking worker dose
using stay time tracking, telemetry, and/or remote monitoring
2.0 Establish
a means of communication when required for the following:
2.1
Instructing a worker to exit an area when
approaching a stay time.
2.2
Informing a worker of accumulated dose when
protective clothing requirements or multi-badging prevents the worker from
periodically reading issued dosimetry.
2.3
Informing a worker when body positions are
causing increased dose.
3.0 Perform
timely surveys when contaminated systems are breached to assess:
3.1
Contamination levels on exposed surfaces,
including the presence of transuranics as required.
3.2
Shallow and deep dose rates from the exposed
surfaces.
3.3
Airborne concentrations, including the presence
of transuranics as required.
3.4
Potential exposure to discrete radioactive
particles.
4.0 Identify
work activity evolutions that present a potential for airborne radioactivity
and obtain air samples and/or personal air samples as needed to comply with
this procedure and NISP-RP-03, Radiological
Air Sampling.
5.0 Implement
timely protective measures when contaminated systems are breached as needed to
minimize the potential for intakes and personnel contamination. Examples include:
5.1
Using covers or containment devices.
5.2
Decontamination.
5.3
Using substances to fix the contamination in
place.
5.4
Installation of HEPA ventilation per NISP-RP-08,
Use and Control of HEPA Filtration and
Vacuum Equipment.
6.0 Ensure
work area postings are in compliance with NISP-RP-04, Radiological Posting and Labeling during all evolutions of a work
activity.
7.0 Establish
contamination controls commensurate with the contamination levels in the work
area as required for:
7.1
Contaminated Areas
7.2
High Contamination Areas
7.3
Discrete Radioactive Particle Areas
7.4
Alpha Level 2 or 3 Areas
8.0 Implement
measures to maintain work area contamination below levels that present a
significant potential for airborne radioactivity. Examples include:
8.1
Periodic decontamination.
8.2
Periodically changing floor coverings.
9.0 Perform
surveys as items are raised or removed from spent fuel pools or refueling
cavities and oversee handling of such items to ensure compliance with this
procedure.
10.0 Ensure
materials and items removed from a work area are controlled to minimize
personnel exposures and prevent the spread of contamination per NISP-RP-07, Control of Radioactive Material and NISP-RP-04,
Radiological Posting and Labeling.
Attachment 3: Protective Measures for Work in Contaminated
Areas
Purpose
This attachment explains concerns and protective
measures for work in contaminated areas.
Additional concerns for the presence of higher contamination levels,
transuranic nuclides or discrete radioactive particles are discussed in
subsequent attachments. The protective
measures discussed below assume radiation workers have been trained on the use
of a standard set of protective clothing as specified by the RWP. A standard set typically consists of a single
set of outer boots, booties, coveralls, hood, cloth glove liners, rubber
gloves, and a hard hat cover.
Protective Measures
1.0 Concern: Personnel can track contamination to clean
areas after leaving a contaminated area.
Protective measures include:
1.1
Direct workers to the nearest contamination
monitor or frisker.
2.0 Concern: Contamination can potentially pass through
coveralls if rubbed on surfaces > 10,000 dpm/100 cm2. Protective measures may include one or more
of the following:
2.1
Decontaminate surfaces that will be contacted.
2.2
Place clean barrier on the contaminated surface.
2.3
Wear knee and/or elbow pads.
2.4
Wear coveralls made of a material that mitigates
the potential for pass through.
2.5
Use work practices to avoid contact with
contaminated surfaces.
3.0 Concern: Contamination may pass through the clothing
due to contact with contaminated water or clothing becomes saturated with sweat. Protective measures may include one or more
of the following:
CAUTION Use appropriate judgment
to prevent injury, recognizing that the consequences from skin
contamination are much less than an injury from heat exposure.
3.1
Wear clothing that does not absorb water such as
plastic or a similar material.
3.2
If heat exposure and the scope of work limit the
use of specialized clothing to prevent skin contamination, protective measures may
include:
a. Use
air supplied suits to keep the body cool during work.
b. Wear
ice vests under the protective clothing.
c. Limit
stay times to prevent coveralls from becoming too saturated.
4.0 Concern: Contamination can become airborne when
welding, burning, or grinding surfaces.
Protective measures may include one or more of the following:
4.1
Decontaminate the affected area or component
to reduce to possibility of creating an airborne area.
4.2
Set up ventilation and/or containment structures
to isolate any airborne contamination that occurs.
4.3
Isolate and post the area potentially affected
as an Airborne Radioactivity Area and restrict access.
4.4
Require the use of respiratory protection in
potentially affected areas.
4.5
Obtain air samples per NISP-RP-03.
5.0 Concern: Contamination can spread to clean areas when
removing Items from contaminated areas. Protective
measures may include:
5.1
Provide RP support to survey a large item while
in the Contaminated Area and then transfer the large item to a clean bag or container
outside the Contaminated Area using lift equipment providing direction to:
a. Provide
direction on wrapping or boxing the item without spreading contamination.
b. Exercise
precautions to survey and/or decontaminate lifting equipment.
c. Ensure
the container is labeled per NISP-RP-04, Radiological
Posting and Labeling.
Attachment 4: Protective Measures for Work in High
Contamination Areas
Purpose
This attachment explains concerns and protective
measures for work in a High Contamination Area where the extent and magnitude
of the contamination levels require additional protective measures beyond those
described in Attachment 3.
Protective Measures
1.0 Concern: Same concerns exist as for a Contaminated
Area. Employ the same protective
measures.
2.0 Concern: Dry loose surface contamination can become
airborne from wind currents or simply walking or rubbing the surface. Protective measures may include one or more
of the following:
2.1
Keep surfaces wet.
2.2
Set up HEPA ventilation equipment to contain any
airborne radioactivity.
2.3
Use a “fixing” agent on surfaces such as paint
or an adhesive.
2.4
Cover the high contamination with oil cloth or
equivalent material.
2.5
Maintain the integrity of boundary walls or
structures to isolate the airborne radioactivity.
2.6
Wear respiratory protection while in the area as
determined by a TEDE ALARA evaluation.
2.7
Control ventilation flow rates and direction.
2.8
Decontaminate the surfaces to lower the
removable contamination levels.
3.0 Concern: Contamination on protective clothing may not
be easily contained when exiting the area.
Protective measures may include one or more of the following:
3.1
Contain the high contamination to a small area,
e.g. the internal surface of a system component, by wiping down and frequently changing
gloves that contact highly contaminated surfaces before contacting surfaces
with lower contamination levels.
3.2
Establish a two step-off-pad (SOP) arrangement
to remove highly contaminated outer protective clothing prior to traversing to
the next SOP to remove the remaining protective clothing. Consider the following when evaluating the
use of two SOPs:
a. Maintain
a sufficient distance, if available, between the SOP from the High
Contamination Area to the SOP for the Contaminated Area to provide containment
and routine decontamination in the Contaminated Area.
b. Instruct
workers to wear two sets of outer boots, two pairs of coveralls, and two sets
of rubber gloves or as directed by the RWP.
c. Instruct
workers to exit the High Contamination Area by removing, in order, the outer
gloves, the outer coveralls, and the outer boots, stepping on the SOP while
removing each outer boot.
1) Deviations
should be specified by the RWP.
2) The
process for removing protective clothing at the next SOP is the same as taught
in radiation worker training.
d. If
sufficient room is not available for a two SOP arrangement, decontaminate the
area where the protective clothing is removed at a frequency that prevents the
spread of contamination outside the posted boundary.
4.0 Concern: Removable contamination on items removed from
High Contamination Areas may be difficult to contain. Protective measures may include:
4.1
Wipe down or decontaminate the items inside the
High Contamination Area to acceptable contamination levels before they are
taken across the boundary to the Contaminated Area. The item can then be removed using normal
practices for Contaminated Areas.
4.2
Use double containers; remove the item to a
container in the Contaminated Area and then remove that container outside the
Contaminated Area into a container that is clean on the outside.
Attachment 5: Protective Measures for Discrete Radioactive
Particles
Purpose
This attachment explains the concerns and
protective measures for work when discrete radioactive particles (DRP) are
present in a work area. Per NISP-RP-04, Radiological Posting and Labeling areas
are posted with an insert stating “Discrete Radioactive Particles Present” when
DRPs are present with an activity greater than 50,000 CPM. Special measures are necessary because DRPs
are small (< 1mm), loose, highly radioactive particles that are very
transportable because of their small size and electrostatic charge. DRPs originating from irradiated fuel emit
high-energy betas and low-yield photons, resulting in high beta dose
rates. DRPs originating from activated
corrosion products emit low-energy betas and high-yield, high-energy gammas,
resulting in high gamma dose rates. As a
result, DRPs can deliver high localized doses when present on protective
clothing or the skin.
Protective Measures
1.0 Concern: DRPs can be difficult to locate while
scanning a surface due to a rapid increase and subsequent decrease in
instrument response when the detector passes over a particle. Protective measures require surveying at a
low velocity using the techniques described in NISP-RP-02, Radiation and Contamination Surveys.
2.0 Concern: The potential dose to a worker from a DRP
requires capture of the DRP to enable additional analyses to determine the
potential shallow-dose and deep-dose to a worker. When a DRP is detected on a worker that has a
contact reading > 50,000 ncpm with a pancake GM detector or > 5 mrem/hour
with an open window ion chamber (correction factor not applied), capture the
DRP using one of the following techniques:
2.1
Apply the sticky side of tape to the particle,
remove the tape, and survey the tape to see if the DRP is captured on the
tape. Fold the tape over the DRP to
completely encapsulate the DRP.
2.2
Apply the sticky side of tape to the particle to
keep it from being mobile and leave it in place. Take actions as needed to encapsulate the
DRP.
2.3
If the DRP is discovered on a worker’s clothing
or skin, refer to NISP-RP-06, Personnel
Contamination Monitoring. Store the
particle at the site designated location to enable further analyses as
required.
2.4
Follow site-specific procedures for documenting
the required information and initiating further analysis as required.
3.0 Concern: Standard dry-smear techniques are not
sufficient to collect DRPs because particles frequently will not adhere to the
smear and may be dispersed over a larger area than the area sampled by the
smear. Protective measures include:
3.1
Frequently use large area smears or wipes, mopping,
tape, tacky rollers, or similar devices.
4.0 Concern: If the potential for DRPs exist, then sources
of DRPs must be controlled to mitigate the migration of particles into larger
areas and increasing the potential dose to workers. Protective measures include:
4.1
Survey for DRPs when:
a. Systems
are breached that contained reactor coolant water.
b. Removing
items from a reactor vessel, spent fuel pool, or reactor cavity.
c. Handling
irradiated materials.
d. Handling
equipment used to work with irradiated fuel.
e. When
transporting scaffolding that has been used to access system components
containing reactor coolant water.
4.2
Exercise measures to contain DRPs until surveys
confirm the absence of DRPs. Examples of
containment measures include:
a. Applying
water or an adhesive to the surface.
b. Using
wet decon methods to wipe surfaces.
c. Using
containments and HEPA ventilation.
d. Restoring
containment integrity of the system component or package until smears or wipes
have been evaluated.
5.0 Concern: In some cases, DRPs cannot be totally
contained at the source due to the work that has to be performed. Examples of protective measures include:
5.1
Establish a buffer zone to exit the DRP area,
i.e. a posted contaminated area that must be traversed after removing an outer
set of protective clothing in the DRP area.
The outer set normally consists of additional coveralls, rubber shoe
covers, and rubber gloves. Disposable
coveralls are normally used as outer garments to prevent spreading the
particles during laundry operations and to reduce the potential for the
entrapment of particles in laundered clothing.
5.2
Use structural barriers as much as possible to
minimize DRP migration out of the DRP area such as walls, glove bags, temporary
walls, curtains, etc.
5.3
Use local HEPA ventilation.
5.4
Decontaminate potential sources of particles to
the extent practical.
5.5
Use tacky mats for exiting the DRP area and the
buffer zone area to provide additional protection against spreading the DRPs.
5.6
Segregate materials, including respirators,
taken from a DRP area and tag the materials to denote:
a. DRPs
may be present.
b. The
source of the materials, i.e. the area or system.
c. The
potential contact radiation levels from the DRPs.
6.0 Concern: DRPs can reside on the outside of a worker’s
protective clothing and deliver a deep-dose and/or a shallow-dose potentially
exceeding 10% of 10 CFR 20 limits, requiring monitoring and recording of the
dose. Protective measures include:
6.1
Establish survey frequencies in work areas to
require periodic surveys on the outer layer of protective clothing. Survey frequencies are based on the highest
known or potential dose rate from a DRP in the work area using an approximate
one inch reading with an open window ion chamber without applying a beta
correction factor. Survey frequencies are
established by the RWP and are typically applied as shown below to ensure a
potential dose from a discrete radioactive particle does not exceed 10% of 10
CFR 20 limits.
DRP
Dose Rate |
Survey
Frequency |
≤
20 mrem/hour |
Not Required |
> 20 mrem/hour to 1,200 mrem/hour |
≤
3 hours |
> 1,200 mrem/hour to 2,500 mrem/hour |
≤
1.5 hours |
> 2,500 mrem/hour to 5,000 mrem/hour |
≤
40 minutes |
> 5,000 mrem/hour |
≤
10 minutes |
6.2
Track worker staytimes in the DRP area using
site-specific forms to ensure each worker is surveyed within the time intervals
specified on the RWP and upon exit from the area. Survey workers as follows:
a. Designate
a low dose rate area for performing the survey that is accessible from the DRP
area without removing protective clothing.
Survey areas should be set up and designated by site RP supervision.
b. Using
an open window ion chamber, slowly scan the hands, feet, and potentially
affected body areas.
c. Capture
DRPs > 5 mrem/hour and notify RP supervision for further instructions.
Attachment 6: Protective Measures for Transuranic Nuclides
Purpose
This attachment
explains the concerns and protective measures for work when transuranic
nuclides are present. Mixtures of
transuranic nuclides are difficult to evaluate because DAC values are 3 or 4
orders of magnitude less than corrosion and fission products and the gamma
spectroscopy systems at power plants are not designed to accurately quantify
activities of transuranic nuclides.
The radiological risk of work involving
transuranics may be classified as having high or medium radiological risk as
follows:
·
Entry into or work in an Alpha Level 3
Area.
·
Work in an Alpha Level 2 Area.
·
Abrasive or aggressive mechanical action on
surfaces with potentially fixed transuranics.
ALARA planning tools
and/or the RWP should specify the applicable protective measures as described
below.
Protective Measures
1.0 Concern: The presence of transuranic nuclides in
surface contamination must be measured to understand the potential dose from
worker intakes. For protective measures,
Alpha Level 1, 2, and 3 Areas are posted per NISP-RP-04, Radiological Posting and Labeling.
2.0 Concern: Contamination surveys are needed during job
coverage to verify that the transuranic hazards have been properly
evaluated. Protective measures include
analyzing smears for alpha emitters per NISP-RP-02, Radiation and Contamination Surveys.
2.1
If a work area has not been characterized
properly and the transuranic hazard is greater than posted, the take the following
actions:
a. Notify
RP supervision.
b. Determine
if established radiological controls are adequate to prevent unplanned worker
dose and, if not, stop work.
3.0 Concern: Worker intakes of transuranics cannot be
measured using plant equipment for in vivo bioassays. Protective measures to monitor for potential
intakes require the use of personal air samplers unless appropriate
alternatives are specified in the RWP such as scaling transuranics with other nuclides that may be
present. Personal air samplers
are used per NISP-RP-03, Radiological Air
Sampling to identify when in vitro bioassays may be needed or to calculate
internal dose.
4.0 Concern: Transuranics may be embedded in lower oxide
layers inside piping and components due to fuel failures during earlier fuel cycles. Smears may not collect the transuranics when
the system is breached. Protective
measures include the following:
4.1
Plant RP staffs are responsible for
characterizing plant areas and systems based on the presence of transuranics
and historical fuel performance.
4.2
Plant RP staffs are responsible for identifying
when work will be performed in an Alpha Level 2 Area or Alpha Level 3 Area.
4.3
Use respiratory protection and personal air
samplers per NISP-RP-03, Radiological Air
Sampling when performing aggressive work, e.g. grinding, that could disturb
lower oxide layers containing transuranics.
5.0 Concern: The potential internal dose from transuranics
in plant contamination mixtures increases in proportion to the corrosion and
fission products as the mixture decays.
Protective measures require periodic monitoring of βγ/α ratios to ensure areas are properly posted and evaluated for
potential internal dose if surface contamination becomes airborne. NISP-RP-02, Radiation and Contamination Surveys and NISP-RP-03, Radiological Air Sampling provide
instructions for determining βγ/α ratios.
6.0 Concern: Equipment and materials removed from areas
with transuranics may be handled outside the posted Alpha Level Area. As a protective measure, ensure equipment and
materials removed from an Alpha Level 3 are packaged and labeled to alert
personnel handling the package that significant transuranic contamination may
be present. Labeling requirements are
described in NISP-RP-04, Radiological
Posting and Labeling.
7.0 Concern: The abundance of transuranic nuclides can be
high enough to result in unplanned intakes if personnel and materials are not
monitored for alpha radiation.
Protective measures include:
7.1
Require personnel to frisk using an alpha
detector when exiting an Alpha Level 3 area where the βγ/α ratio is ≤
50.
7.2
Segregate equipment and materials that have been
exposed to contamination with a βγ/α
ratio ≤ 50 until
surveys can be performed to release an item from alpha controls.
7.3
Ensure postings for areas with a βγ/α ratio ≤ 50 contain the insert “Alpha Frisking/Monitoring
Required Upon Exit” per NISP-RP-04, Radiological
Postings and Labeling.
Attachment 7: Protective Measures for Airborne
Radioactivity
Purpose
This attachment explains the concerns and protective measures when
workers may be exposed to airborne radioactivity. Potential causes of airborne radioactivity
include the following:
·
System leakage
·
Breaching a system component
·
Agitating a contaminated surface, i.e. grinding,
welding, scrubbing, hammering, etc.
·
Air flow over a highly contaminated surface
Respiratory protection may be used to
prevent worker intakes. Requirements for
using respiratory protection equipment are provided in the radiation work
permit. The maintenance and use of
respiratory protection equipment are not included in the standardized tasks for
supplemental RP personnel; plant procedures govern these activities. Knowledge requirements for the use of
respiratory protection are included in orientation training.
A planned exposure to airborne radioactivity
without respiratory protection may be allowed if a supporting evaluation
concludes the Total Effective Dose Equivalent (TEDE) will be lower due to
increasing the work efficiency of a worker, i.e. wearing respiratory protection
will increase the external dose to the worker causing the TEDE to be higher as
compared to the TEDE without respiratory protection. These evaluations are not included in the
standardized tasks for supplemental RP personnel; plant procedures specify how
these evaluations are performed.
Protective Measures
1.0 NISP-RP-03,
Radiological Air Sampling specifies
when air samples are needed, how to evaluate results, and when stop work
authority should be exercised.
2.0 Work
controls should be implemented to minimize the potential for worker intake by
using process and engineering controls that negate the need for respiratory
protection. Process and engineering
controls may include one or more of the following:
2.1
Decontaminating surfaces to reduce the potential
for airborne radioactivity.
2.2
Install a containment device such as a glove bag.
2.3
Use portable ventilation to pull airborne radioactivity
through a HEPA filter and prevent airborne radioactivity in a worker’s
breathing zone.
2.4
Maintain surfaces wet to minimize the potential
for contamination to be suspended in the air.
2.5
Spray adhesive on a surface to prevent
contamination from becoming suspended in the air.
2.6
Use oil cloth or equivalent material in a work
area to prevent contamination from becoming suspended in the air.
2.7
Maintain highly contaminated surfaces covered to
prevent air flow over the surface.
3.0 Use
respiratory protection as specified on radiation work permits and in compliance
with plant procedures and the applicable TEDE ALARA evaluation.
4.0 Use
DAC-Hour tracking when personnel enter areas with ≥ 0.3 DAC without respiratory protection.
4.1
DAC-Hours may be calculated using personal air
sample results.
4.2
DAC-Hours may be calculated using work area air
samples and the measured stay time for each worker. Use plant-specific forms when recording air
sample results and stay times of workers.
Attachment 8:
Protective Measures for Gradients in Radiation Fields
Purpose
This attachment describes the
concerns and protective measures for work when significant gradients in
radiation levels exist. A significant gradient
can result in a higher dose to a portion of the whole body other than the chest
area which is normally monitored with dosimetry. A gradient can also result in a higher dose
to an extremity, requiring additional monitoring. The protective measures described below
provide criteria for determining when dosimetry requirements may need to be
altered to ensure personnel exposure is monitored per 10 CFR 20.1502.
Supplemental personnel must be
able to identify when dosimetry requirements may not conform to the protective
measures described below and alert RP supervision that additional evaluation
may be needed. Identifying the specific
body locations where a dosimeter must be placed is the responsibility of plant
personnel for inclusion in the radiation work permit and is not included in the
standardized tasks for supplemental personnel.
The evaluation of dosimetry results to determine the doses to assign to
workers is also the responsibility of plant personnel and is not included in
the standardized tasks for supplemental personnel.
Protective Measures
1.0 Concern: Radiation levels in a work area vary in
intensity and may result in non-uniform irradiation of the whole body
considering how the worker is positioned in the work area. Protective measures are implemented to
reposition or add dosimeters when both of the following conditions apply:
1.1
Dose rates in the work area exceed 100 mrem/hour
at 30 cm.
1.2
A portion of the whole body is anticipated to exceed
the chest dose by more than 50 mrem during the RCA entry.
2.0 Concern: The combined beta and gamma dose rate to the extremities
may exceed twice the gamma dose rate monitored for whole body dose. Protective measures are implemented to wear
extremity dosimetry when both of the following conditions apply:
2.1
The shallow dose equivalent to an extremity is
likely to exceed twice the whole body dose.
2.2
The shallow dose equivalent to an extremity will
exceed the whole body dose by more than 500 mrem over the duration of the job.
3.0 Concern: An inaccurate understanding of a worker’s
body position during pre job planning or a change in a worker’s body position once
work commences may result in not complying with the above criteria. Protective measures include the following:
3.1
Ensure workers understand why additional
dosimetry is required and why the specific body locations are being monitored
with respect to the dose gradient and the expected body positions during the
work.
3.2
Ensure workers understand the need to maintain
the body positions assumed during pre job planning and to notify RP if changes
in work will invalidate those assumptions.
3.3
Observe worker body positions during the work to
ensure the assumptions from prejob planning remain valid.
3.4
Stop work and notify RP supervision if the
assumptions from prejob planning for dosimetry placement are no longer valid.
Comments
Post a Comment