The traditional path to a college degree isn't for everyone. Many individuals find themselves seeking education and personal development opportunities outside the confines of a formal degree program. Non-degree college courses have become increasingly popular for those who want to acquire new skills, explore their interests, and enhance their professional prospects without committing to a full degree. In this article, we will explore the world of non-degree college courses, shedding light on their benefits, types, and how to make the most of them. What Are Non-Degree College Courses? Non-degree college courses, often referred to as continuing education or adult education, encompass a wide array of learning opportunities offered by colleges and universities. These courses do not lead to a degree but instead provide a more flexible, accessible, and targeted approach to learning. Non-degree courses are designed for individuals of all backgrounds and ages who wish to gain specific know...
Chapter Overview: Framing the Dialogue
In this chapter, our primary objectives are multifaceted, aiming to meticulously set the stage for the ensuing discussions throughout the book. The focal points include:
Conceptualizing Employee Benefits: Delving into the evolving landscape of employee benefits, we depart from the historical notion of "fringe benefits" to recognize their current status as a substantial component, often constituting 35% or more of an employee's overall compensation.
Categorizing Employee Benefits: We systematically categorize and expound upon various forms of employee benefits, elucidating their pivotal role within the broader spectrum of total employee compensation.
Navigating the Employee Benefit Environment: We analyze the dynamic landscape in which employee benefits operate, considering the evolving expectations and needs of the workforce.
Strategic Considerations in Design: Addressing the strategic dimension, we explore the thoughtful design of employee benefit programs, emphasizing their alignment with organizational goals and employee preferences.
Integrated System Approach: Introducing the integrated system approach, we elucidate how a holistic perspective is paramount in planning and administering employee benefits to ensure coherence and effectiveness.
Unpacking the Cost Dimension: A comprehensive discussion on the cost dimension of employee benefits, examining the financial implications and strategic considerations associated with offering a diverse array of benefits.
To contextualize our exploration, we refer to Milkovich, Newman, and Gerhart's definition of employee benefits as "all forms of financial returns and tangible services and benefits employees receive as part of an employment relationship." Additionally, we acknowledge varied perspectives, such as programs covering aspects like death, accidents, sickness, retirement, or employment, as we delve into the broader definition encapsulating services beyond cash wages.
Drawing upon diverse sources, including the insightful work of Beam and McFadden, our discourse aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of employee benefits, paving the way for the nuanced discussions that follow.
1. Legally required governmental programs
a. Social Security
b. Medicare
c. Unemployment compensation
d. Workers’ compensation
e. Temporary disability insurance
2. Company-sponsored loss-exposure insurance and retirement benefits
a. Death
b. Disability
c. Long-term care protection
d. Medical care
e. Dental benefits
f. Group Legal benefits
g. Property and liability insurance
3. Payment for time not worked
a. Vacation
b. Holidays
c. Jury duty
d. Maternity/paternity leave
e. Reserve/National Guard duty
f. Military leave
4. Additional cash payments
a. Educational assistance
b. Moving expenses
c. Suggestion awards
d. Christmas bonuses
5. Additional services
a. Subsidized cafeterias
b. Employee discounts
c. Wellness programs
d. Employee assistance programs
e. Daycare services
f. Adoption assistance
g. Financial planning assistance
h. Retirement counseling
i. Free parking
Refined Functional Categories of Employee Benefits
While the previous list encompassed a broad spectrum of items and services, we now narrow our focus to more distinct functional categories, aligning with the specific scope of this book. The overarching classifications of employee benefits can be strategically organized as follows:
Legally Mandated Plans: Encompassing obligations such as Social Security and other governmental programs mandated by law.
Private Employer-Sponsored Plans: Our primary focus, these plans are either fully or partially funded by employers, constituting a pivotal area of discussion due to the substantial financial implications associated with them.
Employee Services Programs: Offering assistance for various aspects of employees' lives, these programs include amenities such as employee cafeterias, purchase discounts, childcare facilities, and educational assistance.
Payments for Time Not Worked: Encompassing financial provisions for periods of non-working time, including paid rest, sick leave, maternal/paternal leave, and vacation time.
Emphasizing the second category—private plans sponsored by employers—this book delves deeply into the intricacies of this specific domain. This focus is driven by the recognition that a significant portion of expenses and financial considerations lies within this category. As outlined in the preface, our comprehensive coverage extends to accounting, financial nuances, and related subject matter, providing readers with a thorough understanding of the financial landscape associated with employer-sponsored benefit plans.
The landscape of employee benefits has undergone profound transformations over the last century, marked by sweeping changes influenced by shifts in society, technology, politics, economy, business, and management.
The societal evolution brought about by the industrial revolution played a pivotal role in reshaping the employee-employer dynamic. In the earlier era, characterized by self-sufficient family-owned businesses, the workforce primarily consisted of relatives of the owners. However, as industrialization gained momentum, there was a notable transition from small, rural, agricultural enterprises to more expansive craft-based enterprises. This shift precipitated a migration of workers from rural to urban environments, severing the familial safety nets prevalent in the former setting.
The introduction of manufacturing further heightened the need for a new approach to employee well-being. Workers, now distanced from familial protections, found themselves compelled to purchase most of their living necessities. The absence of safety nets, coupled with the demand for a skilled workforce, prompted employees to assert their rights for better working conditions and job security benefits. In response, employers, recognizing the interdependence between skilled workers and organizational success, began integrating employee benefits as an integral and equitable component of compensation systems. Thus, the industrial revolution not only reshaped the nature of work but also initiated an era marked by improved living conditions, heightened life expectancies, and an overall enhanced quality of life for the workforce.
Simultaneously, societal pressures from religious and philanthropic entities added to the momentum for improved labor conditions. Calls for healthcare protections and other social insurance measures gained prominence, echoing the demand for a more comprehensive approach to employee well-being. Politicians, representing constituencies comprised of older individuals or the unemployed, also exerted pressure on employers to implement protective measures. Faced with these challenges and seeking to preclude governmental interventions, employers proactively introduced benefits such as healthcare, responding to the evolving expectations of a socially conscious and demanding workforce.
Changes in Management
Against the backdrop of these profound societal changes, the realm of management underwent a direct and transformative impact. The evolution of management as a distinct science or art was marked by a pivotal shift in priorities, transitioning from a focus on simple process efficiency to a profound emphasis on worker effectiveness. Employers found themselves increasingly attuned to the well-being of their workforce, whether propelled by altruistic motives or as a strategic measure to avert government intervention. What commenced as a genuine concern for employee welfare soon burgeoned into a manifestation of workforce demands, a transformation significantly influenced by the active role played by unions. Some employers, seeking to streamline or reduce their workforces, initiated the provision of pension benefits, spurred on by advancements in machinery and the ensuing specialization of labor.
In response to the changing dynamics, companies introduced welfare workers tasked with scrutinizing and enhancing the quality of life in the workplace. These dedicated individuals tackled issues ranging from worker health to sickness. However, some of these welfare activities were met with resistance, deemed intrusive and, in many cases, inappropriate. The subsequent evolution saw the transformation of welfare workers into personnel officers, assuming responsibilities encompassing testing, hiring, training, and ensuring fair compensation for employees. While this renewed focus on the human element in the workplace marked a significant step, it fell short of satisfying the broader social movement's expectations, and the discipline of employee benefits had yet to achieve widespread recognition.
As the government intervened with massive social legislation, responding to mounting demands from unions for medical coverage and pension plans, the landscape of employer-employee relations underwent an irreversible transformation. It was within this evolving milieu that the structured concept of employee benefits emerged.
In the human relations era, the field of human resources management ascended, further shaping management philosophy. Human resources professionals assumed the role of advocates for both employer and employee interests, recognizing the "human side of the enterprise" as pivotal to business success. These advocates championed innovative and more effective benefit programs, contending that their introduction would not only bolster employee job satisfaction but also elevate overall productivity.
Changes in the Legal Environment
The pivotal role of employee benefits in the compensation structure can be attributed significantly to the dynamic evolution of the legal environment. Political, social, and economic pressures seamlessly transitioned into legal safeguards through the enactment of landmark laws that not only dictated the incidence but also specified the terms and conditions of mandated benefits. The confluence of business interests, labor concerns, and technological innovations acted as catalysts, propelling the imperative to furnish job security and protection for employees.
The period between 1900 and 1950 witnessed the emergence of a comprehensive framework for legally imposed workplace benefits. This legislative evolution reached its zenith with the Social Security Act of 1935. Concurrently, milestones in wage and hour regulations were achieved through the Walsh-Healy Act of 1936 and the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. By 1950, minimum wage laws were firmly established, complemented by the enactment of unemployment and workers’ compensation laws across most states. Social Security benefits were disbursed, and the demand for private pension plans and insurance coverage became a focal point in union negotiations.
Simultaneously, spurred by religious and philanthropic endeavors, certain groups sought to influence employers to enhance the living conditions of workers. Debates unfolded around the concepts of universal healthcare, disability protection, and old-age benefits, prompting a fundamental question: Should the responsibility for providing these protections lie with the government (at the state or federal level) or with employers? This enduring debate continues to resonate, evident in the extensive discussions surrounding the passage of "Obamacare" and the ongoing discourse post-legislation.
These deliberations, accompanied by mounting demands, introduced the concept of an employer's social responsibility. Businesses, grappling with escalating costs and diminishing profits, resisted these impositions. However, fueled by the concerns of the elderly, disabled, and unemployed constituents, politicians persisted in pressuring legislators. Faced with the looming specter of government intervention and mandates, employers found themselves compelled to provide comprehensive benefits to their employees. This intricate interplay between legal developments, societal demands, and business interests has sculpted the landscape of employee benefits, solidifying their integral role in the modern compensation paradigm.
These initiatives laid the foundation for a robust legal framework encompassing various facets of employee benefits, including:
Workers' Compensation: Formulated to offer protection in instances of job-related injuries and accidents, ensuring that employees are safeguarded against the financial implications of such incidents.
Social Security: Established as a comprehensive old-age protection system, financed through contributions from both employers and employees. The government assumes a pivotal role in insuring and sustaining the continuity of this protective measure.
Unemployment Insurance: Designed to uphold the living standards of the unemployed workforce, this initiative acts as a financial safety net during periods of job loss, contributing to economic stability for individuals facing temporary unemployment.
It's crucial to note that the legislative landscape surrounding these measures has been and continues to be a subject of contention, resonating with public policy debates as vigorously today as when these laws were first introduced. This enduring debate is now encountering the challenge of mounting costs.
Owing to the unique historical and political context in the United States, diverging from European counterparts, the financing of workers' benefits adopts a distinctive three-legged stool approach. This multifaceted system relies on contributions from both state and federal governments, private employers, and individual employees.
The U.S. government assumes a pivotal role in providing Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and unemployment benefits. Social Security and Medicare, in particular, draw financial support from both employers and employees. Simultaneously, private employers play a central role in furnishing healthcare, disability, and retirement benefits to their workforce. Typically, employers bear the financial responsibility for these programs or share the costs with their employees, often enjoying tax incentives for offering specific benefits.
Individual employees, under this arrangement, maintain personal insurance coverage for certain losses, covering the associated costs from their own resources. This intricate interplay of financial contributions from various sources reflects the dynamic and complex nature of the U.S. employee benefits system, perpetually shaped by historical forces, political dynamics, and ongoing considerations of economic feasibility.
Tax Legislation
Within the legal framework, tax legislation emerges as a pivotal force propelling the expansion of employee benefit plans within organizations. This legislation has not only favored the establishment of these plans but has also served as a catalyst for their development by introducing the following advantageous provisions:
Deductibility of Company Contributions: Tax legislation permits companies to deduct contributions made to employee benefit plans, incentivizing organizations to actively engage in providing robust benefit packages.
Nontaxable Employer Contributions: Contributions made by employers on behalf of employees are classified as nontaxable income for the employees. This provision not only encourages employers to contribute to benefit plans but also enhances the attractiveness of such contributions for employees.
Tax Deferral for Retirement Contributions: Contributions made by employers toward employee retirement plans remain untaxed until the employee receives benefit distributions. This tax deferral mechanism serves as a significant incentive, fostering the growth and sustainability of retirement-focused benefit programs.
These tax-favorable consequences have become instrumental in shaping the landscape of employee benefits, prompting the strategic design of plans that aim to maximize these advantageous tax provisions. Consequently, organizations are motivated not only by the desire to provide comprehensive benefits but also by the financial benefits afforded by tax legislation, creating a symbiotic relationship that contributes to the evolution and sophistication of employee benefit programs.
Recent Changes and Trends
Over the past 15 years, the landscape of employee benefits has undergone discernible shifts, primarily catalyzed by the escalating costs associated with providing these benefits. Simultaneously, the legislative environment has witnessed a proliferation of laws, regulations, accounting standards, and internal and external control requirements. In the midst of these developments, Human Resources departments—being the custodians of employee benefit plans—have grappled with substantial budget cuts, encapsulating the overarching theme of "doing more for less."
Faced with these financial pressures, employers have found themselves compelled to reevaluate their cost structures and strategically reallocate some of the financial burden to provide competitive benefits for their workforce. This shift not only aims to manage costs but also endeavors to cultivate a more informed and engaged workforce, placing a degree of responsibility for benefit management in the hands of employees themselves—an aspect explored further in subsequent chapters.
This evolution highlights a significant increase in the complexity of administering employee benefits, underscoring the growing importance of focused management attention to navigate this intricate terrain. The critical nature of this management focus becomes apparent when considering that effective oversight of these programs can not only facilitate cost control but also contribute to initiatives aimed at improving productivity, risk management, and overall employee satisfaction. In essence, the administration of employee benefits has become an integral and dynamic aspect of organizational strategy, demanding heightened attention and adept management practices to navigate the intricate intersection of financial constraints, legal complexities, and employee expectations.
Moreover, the escalating complexity in the realm of employee benefits has underscored the imperative to assemble a diverse array of skills and talents from various professional disciplines. This includes, but is not limited to, the following key contributors:
Accountants: Providing financial acumen to navigate the intricate fiscal aspects of benefit programs.
Actuaries: Employing statistical and mathematical expertise to assess and manage risks related to benefit plans.
Attorneys: Offering legal insight and ensuring compliance with the evolving legislative landscape.
Benefits Consultants: Bringing strategic guidance and industry expertise to optimize benefit offerings.
Benefits Personnel: Managing the day-to-day administration and communication of benefit programs.
Compensation and Reward Specialists: Aligning benefit structures with overall compensation strategies.
Group Insurance Specialists: Navigating the complexities of insurance coverage and group policies.
HR Specialists: Collaborating on the integration of benefits into broader human resources strategies.
Insurance Agents and Regulators: Providing insights into regulatory requirements and insurance market dynamics.
Investment Specialists: Strategizing on the management and growth of benefit-related investments.
Plan Administrators: Overseeing the operational aspects of benefit plans.
Trust Officers: Ensuring the effective administration and compliance of trust-based benefit programs.
The collaboration of these professionals from diverse disciplines is essential in tackling the multifaceted challenges posed by the evolving landscape of employee benefits. Their collective expertise contributes to informed decision-making, compliance, and the overall success of benefit programs in an environment characterized by intricate regulations, financial intricacies, and dynamic workforce expectations.
The diverse range of professions contributing insights to the realm of employee benefits underscores the necessity for a common language for effective communication, analysis, and synthesis. This need for a shared understanding finds its foundation in the languages of business, namely accounting and finance, which serve as unifying frameworks to navigate the complexity inherent in the field.
Adding to this complexity are recent changes in the operational landscape. Firstly, there has been a notable uptick in the prevalence of new benefit options. Traditionally, a standard program would encompass components such as medical benefits, group life insurance, accidental death and dismemberment benefits, retirement benefits (including both defined benefit and defined contribution plans), and various forms of time-off benefits.
Now, let's delve into some of the recent transformations in the working environment that are currently exerting a significant influence on the design of employee benefits programs.
Organizations are increasingly diversifying their benefit offerings to adapt to evolving workforce needs. A compilation of these newer benefits includes:
Healthcare Benefits:
Traditional medical coverage for various health needs.
Health Savings Accounts (HSAs):
Accounts allowing employees to set aside pre-tax dollars for medical expenses.
Healthcare Premium Flexible Spending Accounts (FSAs):
Pre-tax accounts specifically designated for healthcare premium expenses.
Health-Reimbursement Arrangements (HRAs):
Employer-funded accounts for reimbursing qualified medical expenses.
Point-of-Service (POS) Plans:
Plans offering flexibility in choosing healthcare providers.
Acupressure/Acupuncture Medical Coverage:
Coverage for alternative medical treatments.
Experimental/Elective Drug Coverage:
Coverage for experimental or elective medications.
Gender Reassignment Surgery Coverage:
Support for gender-related medical procedures.
Moreover, healthcare benefits are extending to a broader range of employees, encompassing:
Same-sex domestic partners
Opposite-sex domestic partners
Nondependent children
Foster children
Part-time employees
Dependent grandchildren
Continuing our exploration of newer forms of employee benefits, we encounter:
Preventive Health and Welfare:
Initiatives promoting proactive health measures.
Health and Lifestyle Coaching:
Guidance for employees to optimize their health and well-being.
Wellness Programs:
Comprehensive programs fostering overall employee well-being.
24-Hour Nurse Hotlines:
Access to professional medical advice around the clock.
Smoking Cessation Programs:
Support for employees seeking to quit smoking.
Health Fairs:
Events providing health information and services.
Fitness Center Benefits:
Subsidized or complimentary access to fitness facilities.
On-Site Fitness Centers:
Physical fitness facilities located within the workplace.
Nutrition Counseling:
Professional guidance for maintaining a healthy diet.
On-Site Fitness Classes:
Exercise classes conducted at the workplace.
On-Site Medical Clinics:
In-house medical facilities for employees.
Healthcare Premium Discounting for Annual Healthcare Risk Assessments:
Incentives for completing comprehensive health assessments.
Healthcare Premium Discounting for Avoiding Tobacco Products:
Incentives for maintaining a tobacco-free lifestyle.
Rewards or Bonuses for Completing Certain Health and Wellness Programs:
Additional incentives for participating in specified health initiatives.
This expansive array of benefits reflects a growing recognition of the holistic well-being of employees, encompassing physical health, mental well-being, and lifestyle choices. Employers are increasingly adopting these diverse offerings to create a comprehensive and supportive work environment.
This extensive array of preventative health and wellness benefits underscores employers' proactive efforts to stem the rising tide of healthcare costs. Employers are adopting a mix of direct and indirect actions, demonstrating a commitment to fostering a productive and engaged workforce by offering services that support both the physical and mental well-being of their employees.
Expanding our exploration of new benefits, we encounter the following offerings:
Leave Benefits:
Comprehensive plans covering various leave options.
Paid Time-Off Plans:
Integrated plans combining vacation time, sick leave, and personal days.
Paid Personal Days:
Additional compensated days for personal use.
Paid Family Leave:
Financially supported leave for family-related obligations.
Paid Time-Off for Volunteering:
Opportunities for employees to engage in community service with pay.
Paid Adoption Leave:
Support for employees during the adoption process.
Unpaid Sabbatical Programs:
Extended, unpaid breaks for personal or professional development.
Family Friendly Benefits:
Initiatives promoting a family-friendly work environment.
Adoption Assistance:
Financial aid for employees adopting children.
Dependent Care Flexible Spending Accounts:
Pre-tax accounts for dependent care expenses.
Childcare Referral Services:
Assistance in finding childcare services.
529 Plans:
Tax-advantaged savings plans for education expenses.
Elder Care Referral Services:
Support for employees seeking elder care services.
Flexible Working Benefits:
Initiatives providing flexibility in work arrangements.
Telecommuting:
Remote work opportunities.
Flextime:
Flexible scheduling options.
Compressed Workweek:
Condensed work schedules.
Job Sharing:
Collaborative work arrangements among employees.
Break Arrangements:
Flexible break schedules.
Mealtime Flex:
Adjustable meal breaks.
Shift Flexibility:
Variability in work shift options.
Retirement Benefits:
Diverse retirement-related offerings.
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans:
Specialized retirement plans for executives.
Cash Balance Pension Plans:
Pension plans with unique features.
Roth 401(k) Plans:
Retirement savings plans with Roth features.
Financial Benefits:
Offerings supporting employees' financial well-being.
Employee Referral Bonuses:
Incentives for referring new talent.
Full Flexible Benefits:
Comprehensive flexibility in benefit packages.
Credit Counseling Services:
Support for financial planning and management.
Payroll Advances:
Access to salary before the regular payday.
Spot Bonuses:
Unscheduled bonuses for exceptional performance.
Financial Advising Services:
Professional financial guidance for employees.
This exhaustive catalog exemplifies the evolving nature of employee benefits, with employers embracing a holistic approach that goes beyond traditional health coverage. The diverse array of offerings underscores a commitment to supporting employees in various facets of their lives, reflecting a forward-thinking approach to workforce well-being and satisfaction.
The landscape of employee benefits is dynamic and subject to continuous change due to various factors in the business environment. While some alterations can be managed by individual companies, a significant portion remains beyond their control.
Financial challenges frequently compel organizations to reassess their approach to employee benefits, leading to potential reductions in provisions or increased cost-sharing with employees. Legal modifications also play a pivotal role in shaping benefit plans, with ongoing adjustments influencing distinctions between qualified and nonqualified plans, tax provisions, and disclosure requirements. Additionally, the intricate web of laws, including the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), adds an extra layer of uncertainty to benefits planning beyond 2014.
Mergers and acquisitions serve as catalysts for changes in benefits plans, necessitating adjustments to align with the evolving corporate landscape. In a favorable financial climate, companies may enhance their benefits programs to attract and retain top-tier talent. Conversely, during challenging times, benefit provisions often face scrutiny, leading to potential cutbacks or a shift of costs onto employees. The delicate balance between financial viability and employee satisfaction underscores the strategic importance of thoughtful benefits planning in varying economic conditions.
In the context of mergers and acquisitions, a meticulous examination is conducted, scrutinizing each line item of the benefits programs associated with the companies involved. This detailed analysis serves as the foundation for the new company's management to discern and adopt the most advantageous provisions from both plans or, alternatively, to forge entirely new provisions. The pivotal objective is to craft provisions that resonate positively with employees, especially amid the often challenging circumstances following a merger or acquisition.
Recognizing the evolving dynamics of the workforce in response to societal shifts, companies frequently revisit and revise benefit plan provisions. The distinct needs of younger employees, in particular, diverge significantly from those of their more seasoned counterparts. Notably, lifestyle benefits have emerged as a focal point in recent discussions, reflecting the contemporary emphasis on aligning benefits with the preferences and priorities of a diverse workforce.
Beyond serving as a complement to monetary compensation and fostering a positive work environment, employee benefits have evolved into a strategic cornerstone of human capital strategies across corporate landscapes. Recent surveys gauging employee sentiments on various workplace aspects underscore a substantial desire for improved benefits among a significant percentage of the workforce. Notably, younger employees entering or already active in the workforce exhibit a heightened focus on this issue compared to their predecessors. The origins of this emphasis remain ambiguous—whether due to a decrease in comprehensive benefits offerings by companies or elevated expectations among recent generations of employees. Regardless, these challenges persist as pressing concerns for employers navigating the future landscape.
Employee Benefits under Adverse Economic Conditions
During the recent economic downturn, a notable shift in employee behavior underscored the heightened importance placed on benefits. Economic challenges prompted employees to reassess their decisions, leading to a reluctance to take extended leaves, whether for vacations or due to illness. Instances of employees returning sooner than anticipated from maternity or adoption leave became more prevalent as individuals sought to navigate uncertain economic times.
Moreover, employees exhibited a greater willingness to shoulder increased premiums and accept higher deductibles, all in a concerted effort to safeguard their most prized benefit: medical coverage. Notably, any adjustments to this crucial benefit triggered a surge in employee dissatisfaction, with some expressing a willingness to explore alternative employment if medical benefits were curtailed or, worse, eliminated.
In the face of economic turmoil, employees demonstrated a remarkable flexibility by considering salary reductions or forgoing bonus payments to maintain existing benefit levels. Many were even amenable to passing up cash compensation raises in favor of preserving their benefits.
Given these insights, employers are well-advised to consider employee preferences and satisfaction levels when contemplating adjustments or, particularly, cuts to benefit programs during economic downturns. Employee opinion surveys consistently highlight that management actions regarding these programs in challenging economic climates significantly influence how employees perceive their employers once the company's financial situation improves. The strategic alignment of benefit adjustments with employee sentiments is pivotal for fostering a positive and resilient workforce even in challenging economic circumstances.
Strategic Considerations in Designing Employee Benefit Programs
Professionals tasked with formulating and overseeing employee benefit plans confront strategic design considerations from the outset, encompassing the following key questions:
Competitive Profile: What constitutes the competitive profile for the optimal functional benefits to be offered, ensuring they align with industry standards and meet the needs of the workforce?
Program Features: What specific features should be incorporated within each provided program, reflecting a nuanced understanding of employee needs and preferences?
Employee Coverage: Which class of employees should be encompassed under each program, considering factors such as job roles, seniority, and unique workforce dynamics?
Program Financing: What methodologies should be employed for the how, why, when, and what aspects of financing these programs, ensuring sustainability and fiscal responsibility?
Comprehensive Considerations: What are the tax, accounting, recordkeeping, legal, auditing, risk-mitigation, and actuarial dimensions that need to be meticulously addressed in the formulation and execution of these programs?
Administration Protocols: How should the plans be administered, with a focus on efficiency, transparency, and adherence to regulatory requirements?
Communication Strategies: How should the plans be communicated to ensure clarity, understanding, and engagement among employees, fostering a positive perception and appreciation for the provided benefits?
Navigating these strategic questions demands a holistic and well-informed approach, blending industry benchmarks, employee feedback, and regulatory compliance to craft a comprehensive and effective employee benefits framework.
Each of these inquiries holds paramount importance and demands meticulous consideration. This book is specifically crafted to guide the reader in addressing questions 4, 5, and 6. The imperative for adopting a strategic approach is underscored by several compelling factors:
Integral Role in Compensation: Benefits constitute a substantial component of an employee's overall compensation within the majority of organizations. Notably, their tax-efficient nature enhances their appeal as a means of remunerating employees.
Significant Cost Implications: Benefits often represent a considerable financial outlay for organizations. In times of economic stringency, the judicious management and strategic control of employee benefit costs become pivotal for sustained organizational well-being.
Dynamic Regulatory Environment: Employee benefits operate within a dynamic landscape shaped by evolving tax and labor laws, as well as regulatory shifts. The fluid nature of these elements necessitates a strategic and systematic approach to employee benefits planning to navigate uncertainties effectively.
Impact of Legislative Changes: Recent instances, such as the enactment of the PPACA (Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act), exemplify the challenges posed by legislative changes. The PPACA, in particular, appears to task employers with addressing societal issues through their employee benefit plans, further emphasizing the need for a proactive and strategic response.
In light of these considerations, this book serves as a valuable resource for comprehending and navigating the intricacies of employee benefits, offering practical insights for strategic planning and effective management in the ever-evolving landscape of organizational compensation.
The Integrated Systems Approach to Employee Benefits Planning
Navigating the dynamic landscape of employee benefits requires a strategic and systematic approach to design, plan, and administer these essential components of the employment experience. One effective method gaining traction is the integrated system approach, a well-established process that systematically classifies employee life events to discern their specific needs. This method categorizes employees based on their exposure to life event losses and tailors protection accordingly.
Within this integrated system approach, employee needs span various categories, encompassing:
Healthcare: Encompassing medical and dental coverage.
Survivor Benefits: Addressing losses stemming from the demise of employees or their dependents due to medical issues or accidents.
Disability Coverage: For both short and long-term disabilities.
Retirement Security: Fulfilling financial needs in retirement.
Capital Accumulation: Meeting short and long-term wealth-building objectives.
Economic Security: Safeguarding against financial challenges during periods of unemployment.
Workplace Injuries and Accidents: Providing health and financial protection.
Long-Term Care: Covering medical, custodial, and life care needs.
Dependent Care Assistance: Addressing the needs of dependents.
Non-Discrimination Compliance: Ensuring plans adhere to non-discrimination rules.
Educational Assistance: Fulfilling educational needs for both employees and their dependents.
The overarching goals of this approach are twofold: structuring benefits to meet employee needs while strategically managing loss exposures. By achieving this balance, organizations can effectively control costs and enhance communication with employees, fostering a mutually beneficial relationship. This integrated system approach emerges as a robust strategy for aligning employee benefits with organizational objectives in an ever-evolving and unpredictable environment.
This process has demonstrated its efficacy in seamlessly integrating employee benefits into a comprehensive compensation strategy, further aligning this strategy with the broader human resource (or human capital) plans of the entire organization. In crafting a total compensation program, employers typically strive to harmonize diverse elements such as base compensation, incentive or variable compensation, equity compensation, and functional employee benefits into a unified and strategic framework.
The determination of total compensation and benefits levels often hinges on the organizational decision to align with the competitive market average or diverge by setting benchmarks at varying percentiles above this average. This selection is inherently tied to the overarching organizational strategy. For instance, companies seeking a highly skilled workforce might opt for a benchmark above average to attract and retain top talent from a fiercely competitive candidate pool. Conversely, other organizations might position themselves below average for fixed cash compensation and benefits while targeting above-market incentive compensation payouts, thus adopting a risk-reward strategy tailored to a different employee profile with distinct motivations.
Industry dynamics and the unique attributes of the employer play a pivotal role in shaping the total compensation structure. Some organizations choose an average or below-average benchmark, anticipating that the resulting cost savings will outweigh potential drawbacks such as higher turnover rates. The intricacies of the chosen benchmark reflect the strategic considerations of each organization.
In the outlined context, a well-established and mature organization might adopt a more liberal stance on benefit programs, accepting relatively higher fixed costs. In contrast, a burgeoning organization, particularly in the dynamic high-tech sector, might prioritize equity compensation and short-term variable pay to judiciously conserve resources while responding to the specific needs of its growth trajectory. This nuanced approach underscores the adaptability of total compensation strategies to the unique circumstances and objectives of diverse organizations.
Companies characterized by cyclical nature may opt to eschew an expansion of fixed costs through a more conservative benefits program. Instead, they may strategically curtail existing programs and introduce heightened levels of cost-sharing with their workforce. Striking the delicate balance between meeting employee needs and adhering to fiscal realities becomes an ongoing challenge in this dynamic process.
An alternative paradigm in benefits planning revolves around the inclination to reward longevity of service rather than exclusively addressing immediate needs. This seniority-based system recognizes and values employee loyalty and commitment. Conversely, benefit eligibility can be tethered to an employee's salary or classification level, resulting in a hierarchical system. These approaches markedly differ from the needs-based system, which inherently acknowledges that all employees (and their dependents) possess needs that warrant attention, aiming to extract maximum productivity from the entire workforce.
The majority of organizations adopt a dual-objective system, a hybrid that combines elements from various approaches. For instance, healthcare benefits might be determined by employee needs, while group life insurance and defined pensions are established based on income considerations.
An illustrative example of the steps in designing an integrated system involves the following:
Define the job groups covered under the plans, encompassing active, full-time employees, dependents, retirees, disabled employees, those temporarily out of work, and part-time or furloughed employees.
Conduct a comprehensive analysis of current benefits, scrutinizing types, eligibility criteria, employee contributions, flexibility provisions, and participation rates.
Gather data on legally mandated coverage.
Collect data on competitive coverage levels across all functional benefits.
Identify gaps and overlapping elements in the current coverage within each category.
Develop an optimal benefits profile, addressing current gaps and aligning with employee needs, while considering strategic objectives within the broader context of total compensation strategy.
Calculate program costs using diverse data sources, benefit consultants, brokers, and insurance representatives.
Formulate financing strategies, considering self-insurance or indemnity plans, and explore cost-saving concepts and programs.
Address administrative requirements and consider outsourcing feasibility, weighing potential cost savings against third-party administrators, administrative services contracts, or complete outsourcing.
Develop alternative scenarios for the benefits profile, incorporating cost data and cost-saving strategies for each. Evaluate cost savings and containment in each alternative.
Present the comprehensive report to executive management, outlining the pros and cons of each alternative. Propose a preferred alternative approach and its financing strategy.
Upon executive approval, communicate the plan to employees.
Implement open enrollment and establish administrative plans and processes.
Institute a closed-loop measurement system with relevant metrics for ongoing evaluation.
As exemplified by this illustration, the integrated systems approach is a sophisticated method for scrutinizing each facet of an employer's comprehensive suite of employee benefits. This approach involves a holistic examination of programs, evaluating their collective capacity to address the diverse needs of workers while adeptly managing associated risks and potential loss exposures in alignment with the organization's overarching objectives.
This methodology proves exceptionally valuable in the overarching design of benefit plans, assessing proposals aimed at cost savings, and skillfully conveying the employer's program to its workforce. Consequently, the integrated systems approach, essentially a strategic planning paradigm, seamlessly integrates into a comprehensive total compensation philosophy, steering clear of reactionary responses to transient trends, external pressures, insurance influences, and persuasive sales pitches.
The Cost Dimension
The imperative of managing the costs associated with a comprehensive employee benefit program is paramount. Notably, these costs are escalating. A 2012 study conducted by the Society of Human Resource Management (SHRM) underscores this concern:
According to the study, organizations allocated an average of 19% of an employee's salary to voluntary benefits (encompassing medical plans, dental plans, prescription coverage, flexible spending accounts, vision plans, and survivor benefits), 18% to mandatory benefits (including unemployment, worker’s compensation, and Social Security), and 10% to pay-for-time-not-worked benefits (such as regular pay for non working periods like vacations, holidays, personal bereavement, and sick leave). This cumulative expenditure represents a substantial 47% of an employee's total cash compensation, necessitating meticulous analysis, strategic planning, and effective control—aligning with the previously outlined functional approach. Moreover, it demands proficiency in accounting and financial analytics.
All stakeholders, utilizing the language of business, should engage in meaningful conversations about this critical aspect. The SHRM study also revealed a concerning trend, noting that "More organizations indicated that the percentage of payroll reflecting the cost of voluntary benefits (20%) and mandatory benefits (15%) had increased." This data suggests that the lingering effects of the slow economic recovery have adversely impacted employee benefits planning within organizations.
This underscores the vital role of the HR function, serving as the primary custodian of employee benefit plans, in approaching this key business facet with the requisite financial acumen and analytical rigor.
This table provides insightful observations:
Employee benefit costs, on average, constitute approximately 30% of total costs. In simpler terms, for every dollar dedicated to worker compensation, 30 cents is allocated to benefits. For medium to large companies, this translates into a significant absolute dollar amount, necessitating the application of comprehensive accounting and financial disciplines to effectively manage these expenditures.
Public-sector percentages surpass those in the private sector, prompting a consideration for aligning public sector employee benefit expenses with private sector norms.
Notably, defined contribution plan percentages in the public sector are almost a full percentage point higher than their private sector counterparts. As later expounded upon in this book, the financial burden associated with defined benefit retirement plans can be substantial. These plans involve commitments of funds (or liabilities) that must be disbursed in future time periods, presenting challenges in setting aside sufficient funds to meet future obligations.
As expounded upon in this chapter, the imperative for financial and accounting rigor in the management of employee benefit plans has become evident. Against the backdrop of corporate scandals, major bankruptcies, and a volatile stock market leading to billions in retirement plan losses, the employee benefits landscape has grown exceedingly complex. This complexity underscores the heightened importance for in-house benefits professionals, external counsel, plan fiduciaries, sponsors, administrators, advisors, and insurers to exercise diligence in avoiding poor or inconsistent drafting, design, implementation, and administration of benefit plans.
Key Concepts in This Chapter
• Fringe benefits
• Categorization of employee benefits
• Social Security Act of 1935
• Walsh-Healy Act of 1936
• Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938
• Tax legislation
• Healthcare benefits
• Preventive health and welfare
• Leave benefits
• Family friendly benefits
• Flexible working benefits
• Retirement benefits
• Financial benefits
• Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA)
• Cost dimension
• Strategic design of employee benefits
Unit 1 Discussion
Which employee benefits are most important to you personally? Explain your answer.
When it comes to employee benefits the most useful ones to me have been my 401k and my health benefits. I caught covid twice so far and without good medical I would have had to pay out of pocket. Working for the government and being able to pick a health care plan that was right for me has been very rewarding. Not all healthcare companies are created equal either. Personally I use Aetna and ever since I started working for TSA I haven't had to pay anything out of pocket it also helps that I picked a plan that qualifies for Federal savings account as well which covers the higher deductible of my plan. The 401k on the other hand has been able to allow me to start generating a decent amount of money for savings. Its one of the best 401k plans available though I wish I had a little more freedom to choose individual stocks rather then having to pick plans which automatically invest for me but I do my own investments on the side to help generate more income. Outside of that when speaking about covid I was very thankful for OWCP(Office of Worker's compensation Program) Work never really specified that we had that available to help cover our days off. But being on the safety team and working with human resources often I was able to learn that with the proper documentation that we could use it to either continue pay or in my case refund the vacation days I was forced to use since I had no more sick leave and I was out for an extended period of time.
Unit 1 Assignment - Employee Benefits
Referring to Unit 1 Readings and Resources, write a 4-5 page paper explaining the various categories of employee benefits and why they are important to a company's overall human resource strategy.
Your paper should include:
Cover page
4-5 pages of content
Reference page
Employee Benefits
When it comes to employee benefits there’s quite a lot of different ones that most companies offer. Normally these are insurance, retirement plans, 401k, additional compensation, and time off. Each company will differ in what type of insurance plans they pick for employees. Outside of that scope other benefits that protect employees are like OSHA (Occupational health and safety administration) which is required for companies with 10 or more employees.
Generally, most companies will provide health insurance at the very least since it’s often required. With the exception to that being employees that are self-employed workers, independent contractors, interns or are volunteers. That also applies to OSHA coverage for occupational health and safety administration. That of course doesn’t mean the employee has to take health insurance either but getting sick without health coverage can be very costly so most people want that type of protection. Health insurance plans also can differ to different types of plans such as preferred provider organization plan or (PPO), Health maintenance organization plan or (HMO), Point of service plan or (POS), Exclusive provider organization plan or (EPO), Health savings account plan (HSA)-qualified plan also covers FSA or federal savings account plans in the government, and lastly Indemnity plans.
The most common plan is the PPO plan offered by most employers and it encourages the use of employees to use network preferred health services for medical care over ones that would be out of network for that particular company. Employees have the freedom to select any choice doctors within the network rather than being forced to select a primary care provider. They also have to meet an annual deductible before coverage starts covering medical bills. These plans often have a copay. Any out of network costs are often out of pocket and much costlier than in the network.
With health maintenance organization plans or HMO they offer a wide range of different healthcare services through network of different providers which have contracts specifically with that HMO that agree to provide services to the members. But they often require employees obtain referrals unlike a PPO plan when seeing a specialist is required. These plans often have lower out-of-pocket costs for the coverage they provide. They often might not even have a deductible for the coverage to start and the copay for them are often cheap. But a HMO plan won’t cover an employee outside of their network unless its emergency services. That can make it difficult since while the doctor might be in the service of the network getting an x-ray or particular scan or operation might not be covered if you end up with someone out of the network. It can also be hard to find that particular information until after a procedure is done. You could potentially have less doctors or facilities that will treat you in the network and you can’t go out of network when it comes to non-emergency care and the requirement for referrals before care is given gives some disadvantages.
Point of service plans or (POS) are a combination of HMO and PPO plan they might require the employee to pick a primary care doctor from the network but routine care or preventative services aren’t subject to the policy deductible. When referred they receive higher level of medical coverage. If they pick a non-network provider, they are usually subject to a deductible and some bills are paid upfront and must submit claims for reimbursement. These plans offer a greater balance for premiums.
Exclusive provider organization plans or (EPO) are similar to HMO because doctors have a network that employees must use except in emergencies and employees need a doctor for referrals for in network specialist and also are required to pay small copays and a deductible. But often employees that are comfortable with higher medical costs for unplanned events choose this insurance type.
Health savings account plans or (HSA)-qualified are tax-advantage savings account used in conjunction with HSA-compatible high deductible health plans or (HDHP) to pay for qualifying medical expenses. Any PPOs, HMOs, POSs, and EPOs can also be considered a HDHPs as long as they have a deductible that meets the IRS’s threshold. With HSA once an employee leaves the company the account goes with the employee. Employees can contribute to the HSA account. The contributions for HSA may be made pre-tax up to a certain level of limit set by the IRS. Any funds that aren’t used in a HSA account will roll over to the next year and earn tax free interest. Employees can use these for medical expenses and they can use them for non-medical expenses but incur penalties’ and interest if they are under 65 yr. (FSA) federal savings account accounts also can be qualified with a HDHP but only applies to individuals working for the government.
When talking about other insurance that jobs can offer employees some of the basic ones can be dental, vision and life insurance. Dental and vision are optional ones that most companies don’t require the individual to have. But it can be beneficial to the company to provide those types of insurance since having good health can improve the employees work performance as well as show the company cares about individuals. And having good vision is often a requirement for many jobs that also require vision tests in order to keep their job or get their job often.
With life insurance often jobs with a risk of death or injury are the main ones that often provide that type of insurance. For example, I worked in a Siemens factory in the past and life insurance was provided because you were in an environment that had 100 ton cranes moving parts and while there were safety procedures in place accidents do happen and often lead to injury or death in a job like that. Even working as, a TSA officer I have insurance because of the potential for active shooter or bomb threat or just being exposed to hazards. So companies looking out for the employees and their families often provide life insurance in dangerous or hazardous environment’s. The type of life insurance companies often provide is term life insurance and it’s not a permanent type which is often only to cover you during the time you work for the employee and can cause a gap in coverage when you retire or if you decide to leave that company. It also does not build cash value like other forms of life insurance.
401k benefits are often provided to help the employee with retirement. Not as many companies provide these types of benefits in the past as there used to be or you often see news drama of benefits of employees being cut by the company. But for good companies they often provide a match system which matches the contribution of what the employee puts in to the 401k plan. Specifically, government jobs have 401k plans with thrift savings plan which matches up to 5% from contributions provided from the agency and has different plans of either stock or savings that the employee can choose from. Some plans are better than others when it comes to what options the user has like for example allowing an individual to pick specific stocks they would want to invest into. But not all 401k plans have that as an option. But 401k plans are a great way for a company to show care’s about an employee’s future since it helps the employee save for future retirement. Also by offering these kind of plans it allows the company to take advantage of tax deductions for the company and can also help meet employee expectations and help retain the top talent in the company.
Additional compensation can be in the form of additional pay or different paid benefits offered to the employee such as severance pay, back pay, bonuses, uniform compensations, and wellness bonuses. These types of compensation can be used to award employees for a vary of reasons. Like rewarding employees for wellness and health can be an effective way to show the company cares about the employee and is giving them an incentive to stay healthy and active. Some companies provide employees with gym memberships or pay for services outside of the scope of health insurance as an added bonus. Severance pay can be offered in the case of a company needing to do layoffs or downsizings or in terms of retirement. And is often paid based on the employee’s service years or experience at the company. Bonuses are often given to show an employee they are valued by a company they can be based on performance reviews done by human resources or just any general bonus like an end of the year or for hitting a particular milestone within the company. It can be used to give employees incentive to keep doing better and also give employees who didn’t meet expectations a reason to work harder in order to get those bonuses next time. Uniform compensations can come either in the form of money provided to purchase uniforms or uniform being provided to the individuals it can also cover materials required for the job environment. Like for example if a company requires specific work boots like when I worked at Siemens you needed steel toe boots with slip and chemical resistance because of the work environment. Providing that can show the employee you also care about safety and wellbeing of the employee as well as help make things more safe when meeting low injury reports when it comes to occupational safety and health administration.
Time off awards are often in the form of vacation time. Some companies provide a certain amount of vacation based on years of service or other factors. Time off awards could be given as an incentive as well for employee’s hard work. Especially in the case of requiring mandatory overtime. TSA specifically had mandatory overtime but the time off awards could only be used if the calendar wasn’t filled so many employees couldn’t use the time off award within the allowed window that in itself lead to a lot of low morale and also hurt retention of employees. But when used correctly time off awards can help retain workforce as well as improve morale and help employee retention.
Having a really good occupational safety and health plan is really important as well for human resources because the more injuries that need to be reported the more it looks bad overall for the company. Also the more worker’s compensation claims the company will need to complete and providing a safe environment saves the company money in the long run. So while often OSHA programs really might not be considered an employee benefit they really do benefit employees by keeping them safe from work hazards and help save the company money in the process especially since OSHA does audits on companies and will fine companies when things aren’t properly fixed and procedures aren’t followed like they should be. A good company will have more reports of things fixed then it will have injury reports.
All of these benefits and things that companies can provide lead to a successful human resource strategy which each company will decide to use will differ based on the company and also how big the company is because bigger companies often have more to offer an employee. But when a company has a good work ethic and provides good employee benefits it can help that company when human resources tries to recruit more employees and makes it more likely that people will seek the company out rather than the company needing to waste more resources in order to try to go to job fairs and all to get interested individuals since the benefits will bring interested parties to the company. It also helps retain talented management as well as talented employees by giving incentives and bonuses to employees that work hard. And also is a big morale increaser a company with a high morale will have happy employees and happy employees will work more efficiently and be much more productive then employees that are unhappy. Positive morale also helps retain workforce.
A company that doesn’t have a good human resource strategy is like TSA which I work for they have been trying to retain the workforce and trying different things to get management to work in a more productive way but there’s still too many policies’ that work against the employees. Such as very strict schedule that most employees can’t maintain they also don’t tell employees the strict requirements until after they go through training. There’s limitation on using sick leave for the first 2 years of employment which causes many to leave or get fired since you work in an environment that you are often exposed to disease dealing with high number of passengers daily. And bonuses have been taken away from employees. While we did get a pay increase we still aren’t up to the level of rights and protections that the rest of the government has with general schedule pay leaving TSA with a high loss of retention as an employee that has been with TSA for the past 5 years all of the class that came in the same time as me of 20 people only 15 made it through the training the first 5 weeks. Another 10 people left within the first 6 months because they realized they wouldn’t get to pick work time or work days as well as days off. And only 3 people made it to the 2-year mark before transferring into other parts of the government. With an 85% loss of workforce and low morale mandatory overtime takes over to fill needed space in which you give up your days off to work and don’t have a choice in the matter. If it wasn’t for the program my union offered for free college I would have left TSA but will likely do so when I finish my degree. But all of the negatives make it very hard for them to recruit more employees and also desperate to hire anyone. I went to a hiring blitz to help out once and people show up in pajamas and smell like a bag of weed and no one is rejected from going through it unless they fail the drug test. It was very different when I had my interview but that was also a time before Covid when the standards of TSA were much higher because they weren’t so short of workforce.
In
conclusion when a company provides the right benefits for employees and the
management and human resources does what is needed to provide a good morale and
really keeps the proper atmosphere the company will succeed and continue to
grow correctly instead of the above the negative way to run a company that
makes it difficult for employees and hurts the overall work environment and
work culture.
Comments
Post a Comment